Rigid software
The operation must conform to fixed screens and workflows even when the physical process differs.
Start with a supported operational foundation. Shape approved configuration around the organization today, while deeper composition and extension remain clearly labeled future direction under Arrowhead governance.
Operations should not have to choose between a rigid template and a custom system with no durable owner.
The operation must conform to fixed screens and workflows even when the physical process differs.
Mobi starts with approved products, devices, data, permissions, integration, deployment, and support, then limits adaptation to governed boundaries.
A custom interface may be quick to create, but the organization inherits device, data, integration, testing, release, and support risk.
Future Direction · Organization environments
The long-term direction is for each organization to have its own approved data access, permissions, enabled capabilities, configuration, branding, workflows, and extensions. This is a design direction, not a claim that every control exists today.
Each level states what the organization controls, what Arrowhead controls, how changes are reviewed, and how changes are reversed and supported.
Current availability
Approved fields, views, reports, roles, branding, and workflow settings defined for the deployment.
Supported components, permissions, data contracts, release scope, and deployment controls.
Configuration is documented and approved as part of the controlled-release implementation.
Changes remain inside supported configuration and follow the deployment's documented rollback and support process.
Future Direction
AI-assisted reports, views, forms, and automations assembled from approved building blocks.
Available components, data access, permissions, testing, approval, and release boundaries.
The organization would review and approve a versioned result before it could be enabled.
Approved results would need version history, disable controls, rollback, and a defined support boundary.
Future Direction
Describe deeper organization-specific workflow, hardware, data, or integration needs.
Security, architecture, data contracts, hardware impact, testing, approval, release, and lifecycle support.
Arrowhead would scope and review the change before any authorized organization could receive it.
Every approved change would require versioning, rollback, ownership, and an ongoing support plan.
Customers direct the operational requirement and approve the intended result. Arrowhead remains responsible for supported components, permissions, data contracts, device and integration impact, testing, deployment, rollback, and support.
Customers do not directly change core product code or production data.
Any deeper capability would require defined scope, review, testing, approval, release controls, and ownership before use.
An interface alone is not an operational system. Mobi's value is the supported foundation around physical work.
Product existence, configuration, and future adaptability are separate claims.
Configure is currently Controlled Release and limited to the supported settings documented for each approved deployment. Compose and Extend are Future Direction.
No. Customers do not directly change core product code or production data. Deeper changes require defined scope, review, testing, approval, release controls, and support ownership.
No. AI-assisted composition from approved building blocks is Future Direction, not generally available functionality.
Current configuration follows the documented deployment process. Future composed or extended changes would require versioning, disable controls, rollback, approval history, and a defined support boundary before use.
Permissions, data access, tenant boundaries, device and integration contracts, testing, deployment approval, rollback, auditability, and support ownership remain governed by Arrowhead and the approved environment.
Mobi starts with supported operational products plus device connectivity, trusted data, permissions, integrations, testing, deployment, and lifecycle support. A blank project does not provide those controls by default.
Bring Arrowhead the workflow, devices, systems, and constraints. We will separate what is available now from what belongs on the roadmap.